If you know anything about buying social media votes, then you're sure to have heard the name uSocial who are probably the web's most well-known social bookmarking marketer. In this short article I'm going to share my experiences with them and if you should be using them at all.
One of the main benefits of using uSocial over any of their competitors is simply that they discount their packs of votes depending on how many you buy -- the more purchased, the more you'll save. At the time of this writing, all of their competitors offered a flat rate no matter how many were purchased, meaning cost could soar for large campaigns.
Unlike a few of their competitors who are simply misleading when they guarantee you a front-page listing on Digg or another site (which is impossible due to the fact they'd need to control Digg's systems to do so), uSocial offer a votes guarantee and actually state their success rate of getting to the front page honestly on their site. This is another reason I use them as it seems that unlike many others out there, they really have nothing to hide.
When you compare their costs with other forms of traffic generation, look at it this way: It costs an average of $56,000 USD using pay-per-click to generate 100,000 visitors these days (which is a figure I pulled from an independent study), however uSocial can provide you with the same or better result with an investment of $200-$400. This is the main reason they've generated so much popularity and will continue to do so in the future.
The only downside to uSocial is that as they're extremely busy it took them 4 days from when I placed my order until they actually started voting for me, though you should only think that's because they're providing a great service.
uSocial are in my opinion the fastest and cheapest way to generate a high-volume of web traffic to your site so if you're looking at checking them out, I'd advise you do so.
One of the main benefits of using uSocial over any of their competitors is simply that they discount their packs of votes depending on how many you buy -- the more purchased, the more you'll save. At the time of this writing, all of their competitors offered a flat rate no matter how many were purchased, meaning cost could soar for large campaigns.
Unlike a few of their competitors who are simply misleading when they guarantee you a front-page listing on Digg or another site (which is impossible due to the fact they'd need to control Digg's systems to do so), uSocial offer a votes guarantee and actually state their success rate of getting to the front page honestly on their site. This is another reason I use them as it seems that unlike many others out there, they really have nothing to hide.
When you compare their costs with other forms of traffic generation, look at it this way: It costs an average of $56,000 USD using pay-per-click to generate 100,000 visitors these days (which is a figure I pulled from an independent study), however uSocial can provide you with the same or better result with an investment of $200-$400. This is the main reason they've generated so much popularity and will continue to do so in the future.
The only downside to uSocial is that as they're extremely busy it took them 4 days from when I placed my order until they actually started voting for me, though you should only think that's because they're providing a great service.
uSocial are in my opinion the fastest and cheapest way to generate a high-volume of web traffic to your site so if you're looking at checking them out, I'd advise you do so.
About the Author:
Want to check out uSocial and buy Diggs now? Click that link or you can click here to find out even more info about this great service.
Post a Comment 0 komentar: